Those who oppose government nonestablishment of Christian compatable monotheism sometimes claim that such nonestablishment constitutes an effort to "remove all vestiges of religion from the public square" or "from public life". This is false because the majority of public square religious displays and public life religious activities 1) do not occur in a government sponsorship context, 2) do not involve discrimination in a place of public accommodation context and 3) do not otherwise violate generally applicable laws. Examples include voluntary student initiated prayer during free time in a public school, advertisements promoting religion on buses and in train stations, religious holiday displays inside and outside retail stores, religious observance on television and radio, religious displays on privately owned property, etc. These are free exercise of religion protected activites and displays in public life and the public square. Asserting that such activities and displays are threatened by nonestablishment and nondiscrimination enforcement is disengenuous. The popularity of this misleading claim is a measure of the extent of public ignorance of nonestablishment and nondiscrimination law which in turn is a measure of the success of some self-interested religious institutions that resort to the squalid tactic of incitement on behalf of promoting and defending offical government favoritism for their religious beliefs over competing beliefs.